Understanding the capacity of children with congenital unilateral below-elbow deficiency to actuate their affected muscles.

In recent years, commercially available dexterous upper limb prostheses for children have begun to emerge. These devices derive control signals from surface electromyography (measure of affected muscle electrical activity, sEMG) to drive a variety of grasping motions. However, the ability for children with congenital upper limb deficiency to actuate their affected muscles to achieve naturalistic prosthetic control is not well understood, as compared to adults or children with acquired hand loss. To address this gap, we collected sEMG data from 9 congenital one-handed participants ages 8-20 years as they envisioned and attempted to perform 10 different movements with their missing hands. Seven sEMG electrodes were adhered circumferentially around the participant's affected and unaffected limbs and participants mirrored the attempted missing hand motions with their intact side. To analyze the collected sEMG data, we used time and frequency domain analyses. We found that for the majority of participants, attempted hand movements produced detectable and consistent muscle activity, and the capacity to achieve this was not dissimilar across the affected and unaffected sides. These data suggest that children with congenital hand absence retain a degree of control over their affected muscles, which has important implications for translating and refining advanced prosthetic control technologies for children.

Moving a missing hand: children born with below elbow deficiency can enact hand grasp patterns with their residual muscles.

Children with a unilateral congenital below elbow deficiency (UCBED) have one typical upper limb and one that lacks a hand, ending below the elbow at the proximal/mid forearm. UCBED is an isolated condition, and affected children otherwise develop normal sensorimotor control. Unlike adults with upper limb absence, the majority of whom have an acquired loss, children with UCBED never developed a hand, so their residual muscles have never actuated an intact limb. Their ability to purposefully modulate affected muscle activity is often assumed to be limited, and this assumption has influenced prosthetic design and prescription practices for this population as many modern devices derive control signals from affected muscle activity. To better understand the motor capabilities of the affected muscles, we used ultrasound imaging to study 6 children with UCBED. We examined the extent to which subjects activate their affected muscles when performing mirrored movements with their typical and missing hands. We demonstrate that all subjects could intentionally and consistently enact at least five distinct muscle patterns when attempting different missing hand movements (e.g., power grasp) and found similar performance across affected and typically developed limbs. These results suggest that although participants had never actuated the missing hand they could distinctively and consistently activate the residual muscle patterns associated with actions on the unaffected side. These findings indicate that motor control still develops in the absence of the normal effector, and can serve as a guide for developing prostheses that leverage the full extent of these children's motor control capabilities.

Neuromuscular Dysfunction in Clubfeet Associated With Constriction Band Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Constriction band syndrome (CBS) is a congenital limb anomaly frequently associated with clubfoot. Clubfeet in CBS patients may be associated with peroneal nerve dysfunction in the involved lower extremity; however, the etiology of this neuromuscular dysfunction is not clear. We sought to characterize the distribution of constriction bands on lower extremities with clubfoot and determine if neuromuscular deficit (NMD), defined here as having absent ankle dorsiflexion, was associated with ipsilateral proximal bands. Our secondary aim was to compare the treatment and outcomes of clubfeet with NMD to those without NMD. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients with CBS and clubfoot presenting to our facility between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2018. Treatment with the Ponseti method, at least 1 year of follow-up at this facility, and a detailed physical exam describing lower extremity neuromuscular function and the presence and location of constriction bands were required for inclusion in the study cohort. RESULTS: Twenty children with 26 clubfeet were included. Forty-six percent (12/26) of the clubfeet had NMD. Clubfeet with and without NMD had ipsilateral thigh or leg constriction bands at similar rates [42% (5/12) vs. 43% (6/14), P =0.106], and the majority (7/12) of clubfeet with NMD did not have an ipsilateral thigh or leg band. While children with an NMD clubfoot tended toward more casts, relapses, and surgical procedures, these differences did not reach statistical significance. The use of a daytime AFO beyond age four was higher in the NMD clubfeet [58% (7/12) vs. 14% (2/14), P =0.04]. CONCLUSION: Clubfeet with neuromuscular deficits may occur in the absence of proximal ipsilateral constriction bands, suggesting they may be caused by mechanisms other than direct damage from visible constriction bands to underlying nerves. They can also coexist with arthrogrypotic conditions. Clubfeet with an NMD tended toward more casts, relapses, and surgeries than those without NMD, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. These patients often elect long-term use of a daytime AFO.

The Green Transfer-Long-Term Results.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term results of the Green transfer (flexor carpi ulnaris to extensor carpi radialis brevis) for patient-reported outcomes, wrist position, and range of motion. METHODS: We re-examined 13 patients from a previous prospective study involving surgery for hemiplegia that included a Green transfer. The average follow-up was 8 years with the range from 5 to 11 years. The wrist range of motion and the postoperative position of the wrists were measured. The surgical outcomes were measured via the Pediatric Orthopedic Data Collection Instrument, the Shriner's Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation, Pediatric Quality of Life, and visual analog score for appearance from the patient and the parent. RESULTS: At this follow-up, only 7 of the 13 patients had a wrist position near neutral with the ability to flex and extend the wrist. Wrist range of motion was improved in four, decreased in four, and stayed the same in five patients. In contrast to these positional wrist results, statistically significant improvements were noted in several aspects of the Pediatric Orthopedic Data Collection Instrument, visual analog scores, and Shriner's Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation scores. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up of the flexor carpi ulnaris to extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon transfer in hemiplegic patients reveals the results to be variable but favorable from a patient-reported outcome standpoint. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Review and critique of current testing protocols for upper-limb prostheses: a call for standardization amidst rapid technological advancements.

This article provides a comprehensive narrative review of physical task-based assessments used to evaluate the multi-grasp dexterity and functional impact of varying control systems in pediatric and adult upper-limb prostheses. Our search returned 1,442 research articles from online databases, of which 25 tests-selected for their scientific rigor, evaluation metrics, and psychometric properties-met our review criteria. We observed that despite significant advancements in the mechatronics of upper-limb prostheses, these 25 assessments are the only validated evaluation methods that have emerged since the first measure in 1948. This not only underscores the lack of a consistently updated, standardized assessment protocol for new innovations, but also reveals an unsettling trend: as technology outpaces standardized evaluation measures, developers will often support their novel devices through custom, study-specific tests. These boutique assessments can potentially introduce bias and jeopardize validity. Furthermore, our analysis revealed that current validated evaluation methods often overlook the influence of competing interests on test success. Clinical settings and research laboratories differ in their time constraints, access to specialized equipment, and testing objectives, all of which significantly influence assessment selection and consistent use. Therefore, we propose a dual testing approach to address the varied demands of these distinct environments. Additionally, we found that almost all existing task-based assessments lack an integrated mechanism for collecting patient feedback, which we assert is essential for a holistic evaluation of upper-limb prostheses. Our review underscores the pressing need for a standardized evaluation protocol capable of objectively assessing the rapidly advancing prosthetic technologies across all testing domains.

Association of Parity and Previous Birth Outcome With Brachial Plexus Birth Injury Risk.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of maternal delivery history with a brachial plexus birth injury risk in subsequent deliveries and to estimate the effect of subsequent delivery method on brachial plexus birth injury risk. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all live-birth deliveries occurring in California-licensed hospitals from 1996 to 2012. The primary outcome was recurrent brachial plexus birth injury in a subsequent pregnancy. The exposure was delivery history (parity, shoulder dystocia in a previous delivery, or previously delivering a neonate with brachial plexus birth injury). Multiple logistic regression was used to model adjusted associations of delivery history with brachial plexus birth injury in a subsequent pregnancy. The adjusted risk and adjusted risk difference for brachial plexus birth injury between vaginal and cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies were determined, stratified by delivery history, and the number of cesarean deliveries needed to prevent one brachial plexus birth injury was determined. RESULTS: Of 6,286,324 neonates delivered by 4,104,825 individuals, 7,762 (0.12%) were diagnosed with a brachial plexus birth injury. Higher parity was associated with a 5.7% decrease in brachial plexus birth injury risk with each subsequent delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97). Shoulder dystocia or brachial plexus birth injury in a previous delivery was associated with fivefold (0.58% vs 0.11%, aOR 5.39, 95% CI 4.10-7.08) and 17-fold (1.58% vs 0.11%, aOR 17.22, 95% CI 13.31-22.27) increases in brachial plexus birth injury risk, respectively. Among individuals with a history of delivering a neonate with a brachial plexus birth injury, cesarean delivery was associated with a 73.0% decrease in brachial plexus birth injury risk (0.60% vs 2.21%, aOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.55) compared with an 87.9% decrease in brachial plexus birth injury risk (0.02% vs 0.15%, aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.10-0.15) in individuals without this history. Among individuals with a history of brachial plexus birth injury, 48.1 cesarean deliveries are needed to prevent one brachial plexus birth injury. CONCLUSIONS: Parity, previous shoulder dystocia, and previously delivering a neonate with brachial plexus birth injury are associated with future brachial plexus birth injury risk. These factors are identifiable prenatally and can inform discussions with pregnant individuals regarding brachial plexus birth injury risk and planned mode of delivery.

Team Approach: The Care of Children with Hand and Upper Limb Differences.

¼ Pediatric hand and upper limb differences include a wide range of conditions that may be genetic, part of a syndrome, or arise from birth trauma or an unknown cause.¼ Because of the variety of conditions and complexity of care requiring professionals from multiple disciplines, the Pediatric Hand Team is similar in purpose to the coordinated multidisciplinary care provided by Craniofacial Panels for children with craniofacial anomalies. Pediatric hand surgeons are trained to lead and coordinate the care of children with these differences, and the Pediatric Hand Team includes occupational and/or certified hand therapists, child life specialists, geneticists and genetic counselors, prosthetists and orthotists, pediatric physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians, pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, pediatric anesthesiologists, and social workers and psychologists. The Team must also have access to pediatric imaging, including ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.¼ Treatment of hand differences may include observation, splinting/bracing, therapy, reconstructive surgery, or a combination of these, and indications vary with development, age, associated conditions, and child and family preference. Children who have challenges coping with the stigma of their difference may benefit from programs such as Hand Camp and the Lucky Fin Project.¼ Multiple online and print resources are available to support the Pediatric Hand Team and the child's family and other caregivers.¼ A well-coordinated team-based approach meets the physical and psychosocial needs of the child with hand and upper limb differences from birth to adulthood.

Comparison of Different Methods of Measuring Finger Range of Motion via Telehealth.

PURPOSE: This study examined the accuracy and reliability of measuring total motion of the fingers via telehealth using the following three different methods: (1) goniometry, (2) visual estimation, and (3) electronic protractor. Measurements were compared with in-person measurement, which was assumed to be the reference standard. METHODS: Thirty clinicians measured finger range of motion from prerecorded videos of a mannequin hand with articulating fingers, which was posed in extension and flexion that simulated a telehealth visit, using a goniometer with results blinded to the clinician (blinded goniometry), visual estimation, and an electronic protractor, in random order. Total motion was calculated for each finger and for all four fingers in sum. The experience level, familiarity with measuring finger range of motion, and opinions of measurement difficulty were assessed. RESULTS: Measurement with the electronic protractor was the only method equivalent to the reference standard within 20°. Remote goniometer and visual estimation did not fall within the acceptable error margin of equivalence, and both underestimated total motion. Electronic protractor also had the highest interrater reliability (intraclass correlation [upper limit, lower limit], 0.95 [0.92, 0.95]); goniometry (intraclass correlation, 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]) was nearly identical, whereas visual estimation (intraclass correlation, 0.82 [0.74, 0.89]) was much lower. Clinicians' experience and familiarity with range of motion measurements had no relationship with the findings. Clinicians reported visual estimation as the most difficult (80%) and electronic protractor as the easiest method (73%). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that traditional in-person forms of measurement underestimate finger range of motion via telehealth; a new computer-based method (ie, electronic protractor) was found to be more accurate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of an electronic protractor can be beneficial to clinicians measuring range of motion in patients virtually.

Maternal Epidemiology of Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries in California: 1996 to 2012.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) and its associations with maternal demographic factors. Additionally, we sought to determine whether longitudinal changes in BPBI incidence differed by maternal demographics. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of over 8 million maternal-infant pairs using California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Linked Birth Files from 1991 to 2012. Descriptive statistics were used to determine BPBI incidence and the prevalence of maternal demographic factors (race, ethnicity, age). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine associations of year, maternal race, ethnicity, and age with BPBI. Excess population-level risk associated with these characteristics was determined by calculating population attributable fractions. RESULTS: The incidence of BPBI between 1991 and 2012 was 1.28 per 1,000 live births, with peak incidence of 1.84 per 1,000 in 1998 and low of 0.9 per 1,000 in 2008. Incidence varied by demographic group, with infants of Black (1.78 per 1,000) and Hispanic (1.34 per 1,000) mothers having higher incidences compared with White (1.25 per 1,000), Asian (0.8 per 1,000), Native American (1.29 per 1,000), other race (1.35 per 1,000), and non-Hispanic (1.15 per 1,000) mothers. After controlling for delivery method, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, and year, infants of Black (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.70, 2.08), Hispanic (AOR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.18, 1.32), and advanced-age mothers (AOR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.25) were at increased risk. Disparities in risk experienced by Black, Hispanic, and advanced-age mothers contributed to a 5, 10, and 2% excess risk at the population level, respectively. Longitudinal trends in incidence did not vary among demographic groups. Population-level changes in maternal demographics did not explain changes in incidence over time. CONCLUSION: Although BPBI incidence has decreased in California, demographic disparities exist. Infants of Black, Hispanic, and advanced-age mothers are at increased BPBI risk compared with White, non-Hispanic, and younger mothers. KEY POINTS: · The incidence of BPBI has decreased over time.. · Demographic disparities in BPBI incidence and risk exist.. · Infants of Black, Hispanic, and advanced age mothers are at greatest risk of BPBI..

Do Nails and Nubbins Matter? A Comparison of Symbrachydactyly and Transverse Deficiency Phenotypes.

PURPOSE: Transverse deficiency (TD) and symbrachydactyly may be difficult to distinguish due to shared phenotypes and a lack of pathognomonic features. The 2020 Oberg-Manske-Tonkin classification update modified these anomalies to include "with ectodermal elements" for symbrachydactyly and "without ectodermal elements" for TD as a defining differentiating characteristic. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize ectodermal elements and the level of deficiency and to examine whether ectodermal elements versus the level of deficiency was a greater determining factor for Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) surgeons making the diagnosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 254 extremities from the CoULD registry with a diagnosis of symbrachydactyly or TD by pediatric hand surgeons. Ectodermal elements and the level of deficiency were characterized. A review of the registry radiographs and photographs was used to classify the diagnosis and compare it with the diagnosis given by the pediatric hand surgeons. The presence/absence of nubbins versus the level of deficiency as the determining factor to differentiate the pediatric hand surgeons' diagnosis of symbrachydactyly (with nubbins) versus TD (without nubbins) was analyzed. RESULTS: Based on radiographs and photographs of the 254 extremities, 66% had nubbins on the distal end of the limb; of the limbs with nubbins, nails were present on 51%. The level of deficiency was amelia/humeral (n = 9), <1/3 transverse forearm (n = 23), 1/3 to 2/3 transverse forearm (n = 27), 2/3 to full forearm TD (n = 38), and metacarpal/phalangeal (n = 103). The presence of nubbins was associated with a four times higher likelihood of a pediatric hand surgeon's diagnosis of symbrachydactyly. However, a distal deficiency is associated with a 20-times higher likelihood of a diagnosis of symbrachydactyly than a proximal deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Although both the level of deficiency and ectodermal elements are important, the level of deficiency was a greater determining factor for a diagnosis of symbrachydactyly versus TD. Our results suggest that the level of deficiency and nubbins should both be described to help provide greater clarity in the diagnosis of symbrachydactyly versus TD. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic IV.

Self-concept development in children with limb differences: A scoping review.

Having a visible physical difference, such as a limb difference, can have a significant impact on a child's psychosocial development, as children with limb differences may experience negative psychosocial sequelae. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate the findings of literature pertaining to self-concept of children with limb differences. Using the PRISMA ScR guidelines, a literature search was conducted in Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and PubMed databases. Nine articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Two studies focused on evaluating self-concept, whereas the remaining seven studies focused on associated constructs of self-concept (i.e., self-perception and self-esteem). The findings of these studies indicated that the social environment directly impacted the development of psychopathology and self-concept in children with limb differences. This review demonstrated a need for a gold standard instrument with which to assess children's self-concept. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Level IV: Evidence derived from guidelines developed from a systematic review of existing qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research studies.

Long-Term Outcomes of Biceps Rerouting for Flexible Supination Contractures in Children With Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries.

PURPOSE: Forearm supination contractures occur in 7% of children with brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI). Biceps rerouting is proposed when pronation has deteriorated but is passively correctable to at least 0° (neutral). The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate long-term outcomes of biceps rerouting for this indication, including magnitude and maintenance of correction, complications, and subsequent osteotomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all children with BPBI and forearm supination contractures treated with biceps rerouting alone, for the above indications, from 1993 to 2017 with at least 2 years follow-up. Demographic information, BPBI characteristics, surgical details, and ranges of motion were obtained from medical records. Pre- and postoperative active pronation (AP) and supination (AS), elbow flexion contracture, and arc of forearm rotation (Arc) were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Twenty-five children (13 females; 13 left forearms; 15 global BPBI) underwent biceps rerouting at age 7 ± 3 years and were followed for 6 ± 3 years. Before surgery, the mean AP and AS were 6° ± 29° and 62° ± 27°, respectively. At the final follow-up, the mean AP, AS, and Arc were 39° ± 36°, 18° ± 34°, and 57° ± 42°, respectively. AP was significantly improved and AS was significantly decreased by 2 years after surgery and at the final follow-up. Neither Arc nor elbow flexion contracture changed significantly. Two of 25 (8%) children underwent subsequent forearm osteotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Biceps rerouting in children with BPBI improves the forearm position when pronation is deteriorating by shifting the arc from supination to pronation without decreasing the arc of motion or worsening elbow flexion contractures. There is a low risk of complications and a limited need for subsequent forearm osteotomy. These results are maintained over time. When performed before passive pronation is reduced beyond neutral, this procedure may prevent severe supination contractures and reduce the need for forearm osteotomy. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Reliability of the Masada Classification for Forearm Involvement in Patients With Hereditary Multiple Osteochondromas (HMO).

BACKGROUND: Classifications describing forearm lesions in patients with Hereditary Multiple Osteochondromatosis (HMO) have been used to recommend surgical intervention and stratify outcomes; however, there is no consensus on which classification offers greater reliability. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of the Masada classification and newer classifications among pediatric hand surgeons. METHODS: One hundred one patients with HMO between June 2014 and October 2019 were enrolled in the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) Registry. Of those, 67 patients with 101 forearms were included. Four pediatric hand surgeons from the CoULD study group undertook an online evaluation. Each rater classified radiographs according to the Masada classification. Six weeks later, raters were asked to reclassify images according to the Masada, Gottschalk, and Jo classifications. Rater agreement for these classifications was assessed by estimating Fleiss kappa along with a 95% CI. RESULTS: Interrater agreement for Masada classification after the first reading was poor (κ=0.35; 95% CI=0.30-0.41) across all raters. Interrater agreement across the 4 raters decreased for the Masada classification from the first to the second reading (κ=0.35 vs 0.21; P <0.001). Intrarater agreement for the Masada classification ranged from 0.32 to 0.63 from the first to the second study reading. Gottschalk and Jo classifications yielded significantly better interrater agreement compared with Masada (κ=0.43 vs 0.21; P <0.001). Unclassifiable cases were highest in the Masada classification (34% to 44%) and lower in the Jo (17%) and Gottschalk (14%) classifications. CONCLUSION: Despite wide use, the Masada classification was found to have low reliability when classifying forearm deformities in HMO. Gottschalk offered more options for location, yet lacked deformity description including radial head dislocation. Jo classification offered more locations than Masada and incorporated radial head dislocation in some patterns. Based on the shortcomings in all 3 classification systems, the development of a more inclusive and reliable classification is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II; Diagnostic.

Patient-reported Outcomes for Children With Unilateral Congenital Below Elbow Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS ® ) is a validated tool used to evaluate different domains of function in patients with chronic health conditions. This tool has not been validated in children with unilateral congenital below elbow deficiency (UCBED). The purpose of this study was to determine whether PROMIS discerns functional impairment for children with UCBED and whether children with UCBED differ from the general population with respect to PROMIS outcomes. We hypothesized that children with UCBED report mild impairment in upper extremity function but normal mobility, pain interference and peer relations. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children aged 5 to 17 years with a diagnosis of UCBED who completed a PROMIS questionnaire at their clinic visit at the [blinded locations] was conducted between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2020. The mean PROMIS scores of UCBED patients were compared with that of the general reference population. Mann Whitney and ANOVA tests were used to explore the differences across the PROMIS upper extremity function domain by arm length and prosthesis use. RESULTS: Fifty-five children (28 boys) with a mean age of 11±3.6 years met the inclusion criteria. Children with UCBED had similar PROMIS scores as the reference population in mobility (51.9±6.2), peer relations (53.5±9.4), and pain interference (40.1±7.2), with mild impairment in the upper extremity function (44.3±10.7). Compared with the 8 to 17-year-old cohort, the parent-proxy (5 to 7-year-old group) reported significantly more upper extremity function impairment (31.3±5.9) vs (48.0±8.8) ( P =0.000). The two age groups did not differ with respect to mobility, pain interference and peer relations. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms previous findings that children with UCBED report upper extremity function, peer relationships, pain interference, and mobility, similar to the reference population. In addition, parents of younger children with UCBED report more upper extremity functional impairment than is self-reported by older children with UCBED. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III (comparison with reference population).

Clinical Manifestations of Constriction Band Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Constriction band syndrome (CBS) is a congenital limb anomaly with varying presentation. We sought to characterize the clinical manifestations of CBS by analyzing a large cohort of patients. Our secondary aim was to evaluate potential risk factors for CBS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records for all patients with CBS who had presented to our tertiary medical center between 1998 and 2018. Examination by a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon and the presence of pathognomonic features were inclusion criteria. Clinical notes, photographs, and radiographs were reviewed to determine the pattern of limb involvement and associated conditions. Demographic data were compared with population averages to assess for possible risk factors. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight children were included. The most prevalent feature was constriction bands (96%), followed by limb or digit amputations (88%) and syndactyly/acrosyndactyly (69%). Children without constriction bands presented with either acrosyndactyly or growth of an osseous spike from a congenital diaphyseal limb or digit amputation. There was a strong predilection for involvement of central digits of the hands and feet, with sparing of the thumb/great toe and small finger/toe. The average number of involved limbs per child was 2.6; 23% of the children had involvement of only 1 limb. Children with at least 1 additional diagnosis had more limbs affected by CBS than those who were otherwise healthy (2 limbs [interquartile range (IQR), 1-3 limbs] versus 3 limbs [IQR, 2-4 limbs]; p = 0.006), suggesting a more severe phenotype. Children with more limbs involved underwent more surgical procedures (p < 0.001). CBS was associated with gestational trauma, prematurity, low birth weight, young and old maternal age, and higher social deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: Children with CBS can be categorized as having either mild or extensive involvement based on the number of involved limbs and associated conditions. Future investigation of prenatal risk factors is necessary to further elucidate the etiology of this heterogenous condition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A review of upper limb pediatric prostheses and perspectives on future advancements.

Many complex factors affect whether a child with a congenital upper limb deficiency will wear a prosthetic limb. Ultimately, for a child to wear and use their prosthesis, it must facilitate the effective performance of daily tasks and promote healthy social interactions. Although numerous pediatric devices are available, most provide a single open-close grasp (if a grasping function is available at all) and often offer nonanthropomorphic appearances, falling short of meeting these criteria. In this narrative review, we provide a critical assessment of the state of upper limb prostheses for children. We summarize literature using quality of life measures and categorize driving factors affecting prosthesis use into two main groupings: psychosocial and physical functioning. We define psychosocial functioning as factors related to social inclusion/exclusion, emotional function, independence, and school functioning. Physical functioning is defined as factors associated with the physical use of a prosthesis. The reviewed literature suggests that psychosocial domains of quality of life may be influenced by a congenital limb deficiency, and currently available prostheses provide little benefit in the physical functioning domains. Finally, we discuss technological advancements in adult prostheses that have yet to be leveraged for pediatric devices, including describing recently developed adult electric hands that may improve physical functioning through multiple grasping configurations and provide more hand-like cosmesis. We outline actions necessary to translate similar technologies for children and discuss further strategies to begin removing barriers to pediatric device adoption.

Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores for Children With Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for pediatrics is a validated patient-reported or parent-proxy-reported outcomes assessment tool used to evaluate health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic medical conditions. The health-related quality of life of children with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) as measured by PROMIS is not well understood. We hypothesized that children with BPBI would report impaired upper extremity (UE) function but normal mobility, pain interference, and peer relationships compared with a reference pediatric population, and that UE function PROMIS scores would be associated with BPBI severity and patient age. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 180 children with BPBI ages 5 to 17 years old who responded to 4 pediatric PROMIS domains (mobility, pain interference, peer relationships, and UE function) between April 2017 and April 2019. Responses were converted to a T score, which allows comparison with a reference pediatric population (mean reference score=50). Multivariable linear regression was used to quantify the association between PROMIS scores and age, sex, Narakas type, and composite Mallet score. RESULTS: Children with BPBI had normal PROMIS mobility (49.6±8.5), pain interference (44.6±9.7), and peer relationships (52.4±10.6) scores, but reported mild impairment in UE function (40.8±12.1). Age (P<0.0001) and Narakas type (P=0.02) were associated with PROMIS UE function scores, but sex and composite Mallet scores were not. There were no significant associations between the other PROMIS domains and age, sex, Narakas Type, or composite Mallet scores. CONCLUSIONS: Children with BPBI reported PROMIS scores for mobility, pain interference, and peer relationships similar to the reference population but impairment in UE function. Reported UE function decreased with increasing disease severity and increased with age. These PROMIS domains seem to be useful tools for the clinician to evaluate children with BPBI and better understand the challenges they face. Further study is needed to assess their utility in measuring the effects of treatment interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Association of Radial Longitudinal Deficiency and Thumb Hypoplasia: An Update Using the CoULD Registry.

BACKGROUND: Deficiency of the radial aspect of the forearm and hand is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency of the upper limb. Radial longitudinal deficiency is associated with several named syndromes. The purpose of the present study was to explore patterns of radial longitudinal deficiency and thumb hypoplasia in syndromes and to examine the severity of these differences across various syndromes. METHODS: Data were collected from the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) registry. Congenital differences are classified in the registry with use of the Oberg-Manske-Tonkin (OMT) classification system. Diagnosis of a syndrome by a physician as noted in the CoULD registry was recorded. Thumb deficiency and radial deficiency were classified according to the modified versions of the Blauth criteria and the Bayne and Klug criteria, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 259 patients with 383 affected limbs with radial deficiency. Eighty-three of these patients had a diagnosed syndrome. The severity of radial deficiency was correlated with the severity of thumb deficiency. The Kendall tau coefficient indicated significant correlation between radial severity and thumb severity (tau = 0.49 [95% confidence interval = 0.40 to 0.57]; p < 0.05). Subjects with a syndrome were twice as likely to have bilateral deficiency and 2.5 times more likely to have both radial and thumb deficiency compared with subjects without a syndrome. Subjects with VACTERL syndrome (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac anomalies, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb defects) had patterns of thumb and radial deficiency similar to the general cohort, whereas subjects with Holt-Oram syndrome, TAR (thrombocytopenia absent radius) syndrome, and Fanconi anemia demonstrated varied presentations of thumb and radial deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The present study investigated the characteristics of patients with radial longitudinal deficiency and thumb hypoplasia. Our results support the findings of previous research correlating the severity of radial deficiency with the severity of thumb deficiency. Furthermore, we identified characteristic features of patients with radial longitudinal deficiency and associated syndromes.

Outcomes of Botulinum Toxin Injection for Shoulder Internal Rotation Contractures in Infants with Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

PURPOSE: Shoulder internal rotation contractures (IRC) are common sequela of brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI). Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injection into targeted muscles has been described to facilitate functional improvement at the shoulder joint and prevent glenohumeral dysplasia. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of BTX-A injections on shoulder IRC in children with BPBI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 47 children with shoulder IRC due to BPBI, who were treated with BTX-A. Shoulder passive external rotation in adduction and Active Movement Scale external rotation scores were recorded before and after BTX-A injection. We also recorded the number of children who underwent secondary surgical balancing procedures to improve shoulder motion after BTX-A injection. RESULTS: Mean age at the time of injection was 12 months (range, 5-23 months). Subjects demonstrated a significant increase in passive external rotation of 46° (range, 10° to 90) at 4 months; an average improvement of 18° (range, -30° to 80°) persisted at 11 months after injection. A total of 28 patients (60%) underwent subsequent external rotation tendon transfer. At 5-year follow-up, 7 patients (15%) had adequate functional shoulder range of motion and did not undergo external rotation tendon transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin A injections result in improvement in IRC due to BPBI, which is sustained beyond the expected half-life of 3 months. As many as 15% of patients who have this treatment avoid external rotation tendon transfer. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic IV.